Both OFA and PennHIP are widely used methods for evaluating canine hip health. While they serve a similar purpose, they approach the assessment differently.
PennHIP is a method used to measure hip joint laxity — essentially, how tightly the hip joint fits together when the muscles are relaxed.
Research has shown that increased laxity is one of the strongest predictors of future hip dysplasia and osteoarthritis.
The PennHIP process involves three radiographic views to evaluate:
- Joint laxity
- Joint congruity
- Early signs of degenerative change
Results are expressed as a Distraction Index (DI) ranging from 0 to 1:
- Lower values indicate tighter, more stable hips
- Higher values indicate increased laxity and higher risk
OFA evaluates hip structure using a standard radiographic view and assigns a grade based on appearance.
Dogs are typically evaluated at or after 24 months of age and receive a classification such as:
- Excellent
- Good
- Fair
- Borderline or Dysplastic
Unlike PennHIP, OFA grading is based on expert interpretation rather than a numerical measurement, making it more subjective but also more widely recognized.
It might seem logical to only breed dogs with the tightest possible hips.
However, doing so aggressively can reduce genetic diversity and introduce other long-term issues within a breeding program.
In breeds like Golden Retrievers, extremely tight hips are relatively uncommon. Selecting only those dogs would eliminate the majority of the gene pool and create unintended consequences.
Rather than relying on a single metric or extreme selection, we take a balanced and intentional approach.
We evaluate both:
- PennHIP results (for objective measurement and predictive value)
- OFA ratings (for structural evaluation and broader context)
From there, we select breeding dogs that:
- Score better than the breed average
- Demonstrate overall soundness, stability, and function
This allows us to:
- Maintain genetic diversity
- Apply meaningful selection pressure
- Improve outcomes over time without compromising the breed
In most cases, our dogs score significantly better than the Golden Retriever breed average (approximately 0.53 DI).
Our focus is not just on passing scores, but on consistently selecting for:
- Strong structure
- Functional movement
- Long-term soundness
CONTACT USCopyright © Aurum Purus Golden Retrievers. All Rights Reserved.
